Posted on

Obama signs credit card reforms into law

President Barack Obama signed new credit card rules into law Friday, starting the clock ticking on the advent of a host of consumer protections slated to start as early as August.

“With this bill we’re putting in place some common sense reforms,” the president said during signing ceremonies at the White House. As he signed the law, he was flanked by key Congress members who helped usher in the legislation. The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act (or Credit CARD Act) of 2009 includes the most sweeping changes in how credit cards are marketed, advertised and managed in decades

The law limits when credit card interest rates can be increased on existing balances and allows consumers whose interest rates have been increased to reduce their annual percentage rates (APRs) to previous levels if they’ve been good and paid their bills on time for six months. Read the act.

45 days’ notice starting Aug. 20
Consumer protections will be phased in over the next 15 months with the earliest starting Aug. 20, 2009. By that date, all card issuers must begin giving 45-day advance notice of significant changes in card terms. That is also the deadline for giving consumers at least 21 days (instead of the current 14) to pay their monthly credit card bills. (See an interactive timeline of how the bill became law and when its provisions take effect.)

The bulk of the consumer protections — limiting when interest rates can be increased, banning universal default and double-cycle billing, and restricting credit cards for minors, among others — take effect Feb. 22, 2010. The timing of the law was a major point of contention during Congressional debate on the bill. Consumer advocates argued families struggling in the recession needed help sooner while banking lobbyists pushed for more time to implement changes in billing, operations and computer systems required by the law.

Provisions for restoring interest rates to previous levels if cardholders show six months of good behavior do not start until Aug. 22, 2010. Making gift cards valid for at least five years and requiring that fees are reasonable also take effect by August 2010.

Federal rules approved by regulators in December 2008 overlap with the new law and cover many but not all of the same practices. Those federal rules take effect July 1, 2010.

Other provisions of the bill include:

* Fines of up to $5,000 for card issuers that violate the act.
* Banning universal default and double-cycle billing.
* Prohibiting over-limit fees unless consumers agree to allow transactions that exceed their credit limits to go through rather than be denied.
* Fees for late payments, over-limit charges or other penalty fees must be reasonable and related to the violation.
* Extending the life of gift cards and gift certificates so that they cannot expire within five years of activation. Banning dormancy or inactivity fees on gift cards unless there has been no activity in a 12-month period.
* Banning credit cards for people under the age of 21 unless they have adult co-signers or show proof that they have the means to repay the debts. College students must get permission from parents or guardians to increase credit limits on joint accounts they hold with those adults. The new law will ban those free pizza and T-shirt giveaways — popular on many college campuses — if students sign up for credit cards. Colleges, universities and alumni associations would have to disclose the nature of contracts they sign with credit card marketers allowing access to student and alumni contact information.
* Requiring that card issuers disclose how long it would take to pay off credit card balances if cardholders make only minimum payments each month and how much users would have to pay each month if they want to pay off their balances in 36 months.

Obama said the law is for “people who found out that credit cards are a one-way street. It’s easy to get in but almost impossible to get out.” He warned, however, that the law doesn’t give consumers an easy pass: “We expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe,” the president said.

U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who has been holding hearings on credit card abuses since 2007, attended the signing along with Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut. Both are credited with ushering the legislation through the House and Senate, respectively, leading up to this week’s passage.

“Credit card companies have crossed line after line with outrageous practices that hurt American families and businesses,” Levin said. “They underestimated the ability of Congress to turn public outcry into public policy. We faced powerful forces against this effort, but we prevailed. Millions of Americans will benefit now that some balance of power is being restored between cardholders and card issuers.”

Said Dodd: “Gone are the days of gouging hardworking families with ‘any time, any reason’ rate increases and unreasonable fees and penalties. With the signing of this bill, President Obama has ushered in a new era where consumer protections will be strong and reliable, rules transparent and fair, and statements clear and informative … Today is the day we finally make credit card companies accountable to their customers and responsible for their actions.”

Not covered
The new law does not cap how high interest rates can go. Nor does it limit when APRs can be hiked on future purchases. People with business or corporate credit cards will not have the same protections as people with personal credit cards because the new law and the federal rules apply only to consumer credit cards.

The banking industry has said the new law would mean higher interest rates for all customers — including those who pay their bills on time and have good credit — and lowered credit limits or no credit cards at all for high risk customers with bad credit. Annual fees would also return as a routine component of many cards, according to issuers.

“Credit cards provide access to credit for millions of Americans and small businesses every day,” Kenneth Clayton, senior vice president for card policy for the American Bankers Association, said after the senate Banking committee approved a previous version of the reform bill. “Making this credit available is a very risky business and the committee’s action today will unfortunately make it harder — not easier — for banks to continue doing so. Credit card lenders of all sizes will likely have to pull back on providing reasonably-priced credit to a wide range of consumers and small businesses. It is hard to see how that makes good policy sense.”

Opponents of the law say the majority of Americans manage their credit well and the new restrictions will hurt those consumers more than help card users who default on payments. Opponents also objected to the timing of the law, saying it will restrict credit at a time when the economy needs more consumer spending to pull out of the recession.

Many of the major banks have received federal tax dollars to help bail them out of the Wall Street meltdown. Credit industry analysts have projected those banks will struggle to make profits into 2010 as credit card defaults rise to record levels. Some industry estimates are that the new law could cost banks tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue from interest charges and late fees and penalties. Credit industry analyst R.K. Hammer estimates that credit card companies will generate $20.5 billion in fees in 2009 — up from $19 billion in 2008.

“Who are they kidding?” Maloney asked in a newsletter sent minutes after the signing to her supporters. “They’ve already been cutting credit lines and raising rates as a result of the overall financial crisis.”

She added: “It was a long and bumpy road. Some credit card issuers fought these reforms every step of the way — and they were still at it as recently as Tuesday, claiming these reforms will hurt consumers and result in increased interest rates and reduced credit availability.”

About Admin

Hello My name is Oni . I was a Victim of a dirty bad housing fraud back in 2003. This women who i will not name in this blog pretended to be me for god knows how long in the city of Palmdale california. Not only did this person purchase a home in palmdale california under my credit profile' but she also took out credit cards in my name, and also took out many loans on the home she bought with my credit profile. Then she did the worst thing to my credit profile she went to a Bankrupcty court filed documents in my name , and credit profile. I only found out when trying to use a credit card i had not used in many years. I called this card holder to find out my limit so i could make a purchase for my husband Christmas gift in the year of 2003 . But to my surprise this card holder told me i had not credit limit on this card because i filed Bankrupcty last month in September of 2003. I stated to this card holder there must be some mistake i do not own a home at this time , and lived in a town house over a 100 miles away from where this crime took place. He stated to me yes we have updates on the card holders monthly , and we took away all of the credit limit from this card. Now was i very hot finding out not only did someone use my name but they purchase a home in my name , and also filed Bankrupcty on credit profiles. I then went to the net to find out if i really own a house in my name. I got myself a updated credit history report . I found out this guy was right i did own a home in Palmdale , and i filed Bankrupcty by there records this was correct . I was so upset since i was in the process of getting a home loan with my credit score at the time being 750 with 3 open good standing account, and good credit history with the credit companies. My next move was to prove who i was , and where i lived for over 10 years. A police report was filed in the city which i live in at this time in 2003. I gave the police my finger prints , and my handwriting so that i would have this on file for my court case. Someone was going to pay for what was done to me. I contacted the loan people , and told them who i was , and that i wanted them to remove this off my credit profile since i have not filled out any paper work with them on any loans . They laugh at me , and said i should have paid my payment on this home that this low down dirty women bought in my name , and credit profile. I then called the Bankrupcty court were the case took place. A nice men there ask me my ssn i gave him my number he search , and search the files but could not find any Bankrupcty filed in my name at all under the ssn i gave him . So i gave him the court information i had on my credit reports i purchased online . He said this was not my Bankrucpty at all there were 3 numbers turn around but it was a close match but the name was very different spelled among other things. He said i am going to send you out a report of the Bankrupcty that was in your name but not SSN. I contacted a law firm on this matter when i tried over , and over to work things out with the bank over this huge mix up . They lied to me after i went out , and paid for services to help them get there funds back from this house that did not belong to me at all since only my name was use , and ssn was not correct at for me to even be having this on my credit profile . I got sick , and tired of the banks after they sold this home while i was on vacation out of the states. A call was left on my home phone that they lied to the people i paid to help them get there funds back on a home i did not even own in my SSN . But was in my name which was not spelled correctly. After all this big mess with my credit profile i had to get help from a law firm who i told my story , and handed him the proof i could have never did this loan on this home i was taking finals over a 100 mile plus away, and the hand writing did not match my writing at all. We went to court i took everyone to court on this matter . I wanted my credit fix , and i was not taking anymore crap from anyone over this home loan that someone did in my name. I won my case in court , and that was easy to do since i went back to the court where the Bankrupcty had been done in the first place. The judge who did the Bankrupcty rememeber the case, and the women that came the day of the Bankrupcty hearing . Guess what i was not the women that came to court at all. The judge said any fool can see the hand writing does not match the police hand writing file , and the finger prints sure does not match this person at all that is in front of me. I am proof the judge said this women i never saw before in my life until today , and she is not the person who did this Bankrupcty on this case. The judge made them pay , and also fix all my credit back like it was before all this happen , and they had 2 weeks to do it , and the judge wanted all my credit reports in 2 weeks showing they took all this loans , and negative stuff off my reports . My reports were back to normal but i had to stay up on it every few months. The loans were sold again , and again . I got many collectors trying to collect on a court case that had been settled because they sold the loans over , and over again in my name . I wrote everyone who put things on my profile that they had a week to get it off or i would have them in court for trying to collect on loans that were not mine . I had no problems at all the stuff was taken off right away. But i still keep up with all my credit cards i do own , and monitor my credit profiles every few months . Now that is why my website is called Dirtybadcredit.com I hope my credit story can help those who have been going through fraud among other types of credit problems .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s