Posted on

Employee Privacy & New Credit Check Law In Washington State Impacts Employers Similar Laws In 4 Other States

Doing background checks on potential employees, and regularly for certain positions with significant access to personally identifiable information (PII) or managemen capabilities, has been a growing trend in recent years. Such checks are viewed as ways to help prevent putting untrustworthy and significant at-risk individuals into positions where they could perform malicious and/or criminal activities.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) establishes background check requirements for employment that all U.S. businesses must follow. The FCRA defines a background check as a consumer report. Before a company can get a consumer report they must notify the individual and obtain written authorization; allowing potential employees the opportunity to withdraw the application if there will be information that he or she does not want disclosed.

Credit reports are used by many organizations to check on potential and current employees who are in positions with access to financial assets, such as bank tellers, systems programmers responsible for financial applications, accounts payable managers, and so on.

Washington state governor Christine Gregoire signed S.B. 5827 into law on April 18.

As an effect of this new law, employers in Washington state may no longer access the credit reports of employees or job applicants unless such information is substantially related to the individual’s current or potential job responsibilities.

While this new law is fairly short, it is significant. The requirements of S.B. 5827 as taken from the bill:

5 (1) A consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report only 6 under the following circumstances: 7 (a) In response to the order of a court having jurisdiction to 8 issue the order; 9 (b) In accordance with the written instructions of the consumer to 10 whom it relates; or 11 (c) To a person that the agency has reason to believe: 12 (i) Intends to use the information in connection with a credit 13 transaction involving the consumer on whom the information is to be 14 furnished and involving the extension of credit to, or review or 15 collection of an account of, the consumer; 16 (ii) Intends to use the information for employment purposes; 17 (iii) Intends to use the information in connection with the 18 underwriting of insurance involving the consumer; p. 1 ESSB 5827.PL 1 (iv) Intends to use the information in connection with a 2 determination of the consumer’s eligibility for a license or other 3 benefit granted by a governmental instrumentality required by law to 4 consider an applicant’s financial responsibility or status; or 5 (v) Otherwise has a legitimate business need for the information in 6 connection with a business transaction involving the consumer. 7 (2)(a) Subject to (c) of this subsection, a person may not procure 8 a consumer report, or cause a consumer report to be procured, for 9 employment purposes with respect to any consumer who is not an employee 10 at the time the report is procured or caused to be procured unless: 11 (i) A clear and conspicuous disclosure has been made in writing to 12 the consumer before the report is procured or caused to be procured 13 that a consumer report may be obtained for purposes of considering the 14 consumer for employment. The disclosure may be contained in a written 15 statement contained in employment application materials; or 16 (ii) The consumer authorizes the procurement of the report. 17 (b) A person may not procure a consumer report, or cause a consumer 18 report to be procured, for employment purposes with respect to any 19 employee unless the employee has received, at any time after the person 20 became an employee, written notice that consumer reports may be used 21 for employment purposes. A written statement that consumer reports may 22 be used for employment purposes that is contained in employee 23 guidelines or manuals available to employees or included in written 24 materials provided to employees constitutes written notice for purposes 25 of this subsection. This subsection does not apply with respect to a 26 consumer report of an employee who the employer has reasonable cause to 27 believe has engaged in specific activity that constitutes a violation 28 of law. 29 (c) As applied to (a) and (b) of this subsection, a person may not 30 procure a consumer report for employment purposes where any information 31 contained in the report bears on the consumer’s credit worthiness, 32 credit standing, or credit capacity, unless the information is either: 33 (i) Substantially job related and the employer’s reasons for the 34 use of such information are disclosed to the consumer in writing; or 35 (ii) Required by law. 36 (d) In using a consumer report for employment purposes, before 37 taking any adverse action based in whole or part on the report, a 38 person shall provide to the consumer to whom the report relates: (i) ESSB 5827.PL p. 2 1 The name, address, and telephone number of the consumer reporting 2 agency providing the report; (ii) a description of the consumer’s 3 rights under this chapter pertaining to consumer reports obtained for 4 employment purposes; and (iii) a reasonable opportunity to respond to 5 any information in the report that is disputed by the consumer. This 6 subsection applies to job applicants and current employees.

It is worth noting that the new law does not apply to an employer review of the credit report of an employee “who the employer has reasonable cause to believe has engaged in specific activity that constitutes a violation of law.”

Four other states (Hawaii, Pennsylvania, New York and Wisconsin) have similar restrictions on employers using credit reports.

While it is obvious the new law applies to employers based in Washington and employees and job applicants who are residents of Washington, it could also apply to a Washington employer with out-of-state job applicants or employees, an out-of-state employer with employees and applicants that live in Washington, and possibly even a business that interviews job applicants who would need to relocate to Washington to perform the job.

Talk with your legal counsel about the impacts of this law on your business. Consider doing the following, which are good to do on a periodic basis anyway:

* Identify and clearly document categories of employees and specific employees for whom credit information is related to their job responsibilities to justify why credit checks are necessary.

* Review your employment forms to ensure that they are not worded in such a way that an employee or job applicant is giving permission for a credit report review that is now prohibited by this and similar laws.

* Check with your background check vendors to ensure that they do not mistakenly provide credit report information when they shouldn’t be when conducting a background check.

About Admin

Hello My name is Oni . I was a Victim of a dirty bad housing fraud back in 2003. This women who i will not name in this blog pretended to be me for god knows how long in the city of Palmdale california. Not only did this person purchase a home in palmdale california under my credit profile' but she also took out credit cards in my name, and also took out many loans on the home she bought with my credit profile. Then she did the worst thing to my credit profile she went to a Bankrupcty court filed documents in my name , and credit profile. I only found out when trying to use a credit card i had not used in many years. I called this card holder to find out my limit so i could make a purchase for my husband Christmas gift in the year of 2003 . But to my surprise this card holder told me i had not credit limit on this card because i filed Bankrupcty last month in September of 2003. I stated to this card holder there must be some mistake i do not own a home at this time , and lived in a town house over a 100 miles away from where this crime took place. He stated to me yes we have updates on the card holders monthly , and we took away all of the credit limit from this card. Now was i very hot finding out not only did someone use my name but they purchase a home in my name , and also filed Bankrupcty on credit profiles. I then went to the net to find out if i really own a house in my name. I got myself a updated credit history report . I found out this guy was right i did own a home in Palmdale , and i filed Bankrupcty by there records this was correct . I was so upset since i was in the process of getting a home loan with my credit score at the time being 750 with 3 open good standing account, and good credit history with the credit companies. My next move was to prove who i was , and where i lived for over 10 years. A police report was filed in the city which i live in at this time in 2003. I gave the police my finger prints , and my handwriting so that i would have this on file for my court case. Someone was going to pay for what was done to me. I contacted the loan people , and told them who i was , and that i wanted them to remove this off my credit profile since i have not filled out any paper work with them on any loans . They laugh at me , and said i should have paid my payment on this home that this low down dirty women bought in my name , and credit profile. I then called the Bankrupcty court were the case took place. A nice men there ask me my ssn i gave him my number he search , and search the files but could not find any Bankrupcty filed in my name at all under the ssn i gave him . So i gave him the court information i had on my credit reports i purchased online . He said this was not my Bankrucpty at all there were 3 numbers turn around but it was a close match but the name was very different spelled among other things. He said i am going to send you out a report of the Bankrupcty that was in your name but not SSN. I contacted a law firm on this matter when i tried over , and over to work things out with the bank over this huge mix up . They lied to me after i went out , and paid for services to help them get there funds back from this house that did not belong to me at all since only my name was use , and ssn was not correct at for me to even be having this on my credit profile . I got sick , and tired of the banks after they sold this home while i was on vacation out of the states. A call was left on my home phone that they lied to the people i paid to help them get there funds back on a home i did not even own in my SSN . But was in my name which was not spelled correctly. After all this big mess with my credit profile i had to get help from a law firm who i told my story , and handed him the proof i could have never did this loan on this home i was taking finals over a 100 mile plus away, and the hand writing did not match my writing at all. We went to court i took everyone to court on this matter . I wanted my credit fix , and i was not taking anymore crap from anyone over this home loan that someone did in my name. I won my case in court , and that was easy to do since i went back to the court where the Bankrupcty had been done in the first place. The judge who did the Bankrupcty rememeber the case, and the women that came the day of the Bankrupcty hearing . Guess what i was not the women that came to court at all. The judge said any fool can see the hand writing does not match the police hand writing file , and the finger prints sure does not match this person at all that is in front of me. I am proof the judge said this women i never saw before in my life until today , and she is not the person who did this Bankrupcty on this case. The judge made them pay , and also fix all my credit back like it was before all this happen , and they had 2 weeks to do it , and the judge wanted all my credit reports in 2 weeks showing they took all this loans , and negative stuff off my reports . My reports were back to normal but i had to stay up on it every few months. The loans were sold again , and again . I got many collectors trying to collect on a court case that had been settled because they sold the loans over , and over again in my name . I wrote everyone who put things on my profile that they had a week to get it off or i would have them in court for trying to collect on loans that were not mine . I had no problems at all the stuff was taken off right away. But i still keep up with all my credit cards i do own , and monitor my credit profiles every few months . Now that is why my website is called Dirtybadcredit.com I hope my credit story can help those who have been going through fraud among other types of credit problems .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s